View Australian Sex Party Responses

You have selected to view all submitted Policy Areas for the Australian Sex Party.

Please note that the order in which we display the Parties is completely random, and will change each time you refresh the page.

Public Christianity

1. Freedom of religion

Australia has a proud record for protecting freedom, but increasingly faith-based organisations and individuals are unduly prevented from giving expression to their religion, or being pressured to act against their conscientiously-held beliefs, particularly in the areas of employment, service delivery, and education. Would your Party ensure that, like political parties, churches and religious bodies have their right to employ staff who share their ethos protected?

Australian Sex Party
Australian Sex Party

Churches should have freedom to employ staff who share their ethos but should not be allowed to discriminate against these people on the basis of their gender, sexual preferences or other employment choices. Discrimination on these grounds for people who otherwise share a basic philosophical or religious belief cannot be justified by the teachings of any of the founders of the major religions. So someone who is practising catholic and has no qualms with the religious teaching but happens to be gay or lesbian should not be disqualified from a teaching or serving position within the church. In such cases the organization to be subject to the full force of the local discrimination law.

  • Freedom for religions to choose staff of similar belief
  • No freedom to discriminate against them on grounds of sex, gender or occupation
  • Churches liable to be sued for infractions
Top Return to top of page

2. Prayer in parliament

The preamble to Australia’s Constitution states that our nation is “humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God”. Does your Party commit to maintaining the convention of opening Parliament each day exclusively with the Lord’s Prayer?

Australian Sex Party
Australian Sex Party

We believe that an effective separation between church and state does not exist when a prayer from any established religion is used to open Parliament each day – especially the Lord’s Prayer. The line in the Constitution regarding reliance on blessing from a higher being has no specific or implied reference to the opening of Parliament. A far better option would be a non religious thought or commentary based on ethics, respect and tolerance. Any mention of ‘God’ in the opening of Parliament should be dispensed with as it immediately invites ownership and ‘my God’ as opposed to ‘your God’, becomes the order of the day.

  • Prayer before opening parliament is divisive and exclusive
  • It has no basis in the Constitution
  • A statement reminding MPs of ethics, respect and tolerance would be far better
Top Return to top of page
International justice
Poverty
Life
Youth and Education
Family
Sexualisation of children
Environment
Justice
Indigenous issues